Older Posts

No, Stephen Fry, you are not ‘one person’ with young Elliott

Under Britain’s new homosexual ‘marriage’ law, actor Stephen Fry, 57, went to a registry office last week with Elliott Spencer, 27, to get ‘married’. Fry then tweeted:

“Gosh. @ElliottGSpencer and I go into a room as two people, sign a book and leave as one. Amazing,”

How wrong can an intelligent man be!

The notion of marriage making two people ‘one’ is first found in the ancient passage from Genesis, “Therefore shall a man leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife, and they shall become one flesh”. The notion of ‘one flesh’ is perpetuated in the legal concept of ‘consummating the marriage’ through the union of sexual intercourse. In other words, becoming ‘one person’ in marriage requires sexual union, not the mere signing of a book.

Consider the intricate complementarity of male and female in sexual intercourse – every detail of sexual anatomy and physiology being as complementary as a biological lock-and-key such that male and female bodies are functionally complete only in their union. Consider also the profound unitive force of an act that merges bodies and lives in a relationship that is fundamental to Life itself, and it can be seen that Marriage of man and woman warrants the profound description of ‘the two becoming one’.

It is strange┬áthat Mr Fry claims the ‘one person’ unity of marriage when there is no basis for it: there is no physical complementarity and no sexual consummation. Same-sex ‘intercourse’ is an impossibility, and therefore so is same-sex ‘marriage’, except as a legal fiction. Male-male anal penetration is not ‘sexual intercourse’ because ‘sexual’, by definition, means differentiated into male and female. Whether homosexual or indeed heterosexual – note that well – anal sodomy is not sexual intercourse; it is a gross abuse of the human body and therefore (whether heterosexual or homosexual) an indecent act.

Call your partnership whatever you want, old Mr Fry and young Mr Spencer, even call it ‘marriage’ if your government is decadent enough to decree it as such – but the legal fiction is not real; it is a parody of┬áthe profound natural reality of ‘one flesh’ union between male and female.

Comments are closed.

Older Articles
Click HERE for more articles from ~ 1995...
Some Videos
STEM CELLS & EMBRYOS: ABC LATELINE AUGUST 2002 SURROGACY: KERRI-ANNE SHOW JANUARY 2011 SBS INSIGHT ON GAY MARRIAGE 2013 (see post Aug 15 2013) EUTHANASIA & THE 'DUTY TO DIE', 2014 THE HARMS OF HOMOSEXUAL 'MARRIAGE', 2014 ABORTION - 'the silent innocence of the unborn', 2014 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: SYDNEY UNI 2012 (start 2min20) SURROGACY BILL QLD JANUARY 2010
Tweets!